Its called a binary value, but actually stored in hex, so set it just like the picture above, with only four sets of numbers on the right. The registry editor is a little odd for this type of value. Therefore, it would prove that the values are as follows: I then toggled the “Work Offline” button a few times and saw this entry being flipped back and forth: Actually, you should save a copy of all the SysInternal utilities in case they find themselves in the cross-hairs of Microsoft’s “cloud-first” software ray gun.Īfter opening ProcMon and filtering out a lot of noise, I found myself looking at every RegSetValue event Outlook.Exe was doing. It lets you see what reg/file/network/process profiling & thread activity a given executable is responsible for.
If you haven’t heard about ProcMon, you should do yourself a favor and check it out.
I decided to turn to one of my favorite tools: ProcMon Outlook 2013 and later seem to love their unreadable hex/binary reg values, so looking at this with the regedit’s FIND feature isn’t going to help. It is Microsoft Office after all, and just about every configuration is in the registry. Its pretty much a sure thing that this button toggled a registry value somewhere. outlook.exe /safe – does NOT start offline)! I’m sure you’ve got your own anyway, otherwise you wouldn’t be here.įor years I’ve just found other ways to solve whatever my problem was, but not today today I was finally fed up with all the bad advice on how to go about this (e.g. I won’t bother listing a bunch of other reasons we might want to launch Outlook with the connection to the server disabled. For example, earlier today I needed to open a profile that was connected to a “corrupt” mailbox, but I didn’t want to risk the offline version of the data, in case it turned out being the only copy I had left. I can’t believe how hard this was to find! There are numerous articles, including official ones that claim to answer this question, but all pretty much say the same thing:īut that of course means Outlook is already running.
0 kommentar(er)
